create new criminal and civil penalties for commercially motivated invasions of privacy that result from persistent chases or other invasive methods used by photographers, videographers and audio recorders (Quill, 27). That has to count for something, right? According to Andrea Brown, a spokesperson for former governor Pete Wilson, The governor thought it was important because of safety issues for normal everyday people. He states that it s the hunting, not the cooking that celebrities want protection against. In her statement regarding the legislation, Berry claimed the "overly aggressive paparazzi" has caused her "so much trauma and emotional distress." When Garner testified before the California State Assembly Committee on Public Safety, she framed the problem through her children's experience, history and Uses of Marijuana saying, "They're beautiful and. Celebrities themselves frequently have proved both creative and effective in dealing with the media they consider overly intrusive. Paparazzi photographers have to make a living and the famous deserve their privacy.
Articles about, paparazzi - latimes
But the fortunes of movie stars, television personalities, professional athletes and other such pop-culture luminaries derive directly from the fame that they themselves aggressively promote and meticulously cultivate. Hence another reason why a law against paparazzi would be a Hypocritical Democracy unwise. The famous gave up a large measure of privacy for the brighter, larger world of glitter. Adele won the suit, and Corbis agreed to pay a five-figure settlement in "damages and legal costs to Angelo" as well as never use the pics again. All laws are being made to protect against commercially motivated invasions of privacy. His time has come to be bombarded with riches, bathed in fame, and stalked.